Skip to main content
Entertainment

Billboard Charts Will Count YouTube Again: What Changes

Billboard charts add YouTube back in January and free streams now count for two thirds of a paid play. See the new math and what it means for how you listen.

Eli Turner
November 12, 20269 min read
Share
Billboard Charts Will Count YouTube Again: What Changes
Table of contents

Say your favorite artist drops an album and you play it on repeat for a week. You never paid for a music app. You just pulled up the videos on YouTube, the way millions of fans do. For most of this year, none of those plays counted on the Billboard charts at all.

That changes in January. On November 9, YouTube said it is returning to the Billboard charts, and Billboard rewrote the math that decides how much a free stream is worth. If you listen on a free tier, your plays are about to carry far more chart weight than they have in years. This guide explains what changed, why the two companies fell out, and what it means for the way you listen, pay and support artists.

Why YouTube Left the Billboard Charts in the First Place

The fight was about one ratio. Billboard has long counted a stream from a paying subscriber as more valuable than a stream from someone on a free, ad-supported tier. The logic is money: a subscription brings in more revenue per play than ads do, and the charts try to reflect what music earns, not just how often it gets played.

YouTube disagreed loudly. In a post on the YouTube Blog, the company's global head of music, Lyor Cohen, called the formula outdated and said every stream should be counted "fairly and equally," paid or free. The same post cited an RIAA figure that streaming makes up 84% of US recorded music revenue.

Billboard had already narrowed the gap once, in December of last year, so that 2,500 free streams equaled one album unit instead of 3,750. YouTube said that was not enough. It stopped sending data after January 16, and the first charts without it were dated January 31.

What a year without YouTube meant for the charts

For roughly ten months, the Hot 100 and Billboard 200 measured US listening while leaving out a platform where a huge share of that listening happens. That hurt some acts more than others. Artists whose fans skew young or listen mostly through music videos lost the most ground, because their audience was the least likely to sit behind a paywall.

By PPC Land's count, Billboard will have published 50 weekly charts without YouTube data by the time it returns. So if a chart run this year felt off compared with what you saw trending, this gap is a large part of the reason.


The New Billboard Charts Formula, in Plain Numbers

Here is the change as Stereogum reported it on November 9, for the Billboard 200 album chart:

  • Paid streams: 1,000 streams equal one album unit. No change.
  • Ad-supported streams: 1,500 streams equal one album unit, down from 2,500.
  • Album and track sales: counted the same way as before.
  • Start date: the charts dated January 16, covering listening from January 1 to 7.

Put another way, one free stream will be worth two thirds of a paid stream. Under the old rules it was worth 40%. Before last December, it was worth a third. In just over a year, the value of a free play on the album chart has doubled.

Billboard did not give YouTube everything it wanted. A paid stream still counts 50% more than a free one. YouTube asked for equal treatment and accepted a smaller premium instead. In its November update, the company said the new method "better reflects how fans engage with music today."

What about the Hot 100?

The album chart numbers are public. The song chart weights are not. Coverage of the change says YouTube data will again feed song charts, including the Hot 100, but no outlet has published the exact paid versus free weighting there. If you follow singles closely, expect YouTube views to matter again from mid January, without a published formula to check the math against.


A Worked Example: How One Album Week Changes

Numbers make this clearer. Imagine a new album earns this in its first US week:

  • 2,000,000 paid streams on Spotify, Apple Music and YouTube Music Premium
  • 6,000,000 ad-supported streams, mostly free YouTube and free Spotify plays
  • 20,000 album sales

Under the current rules: the paid streams give 2,000 units (2,000,000 divided by 1,000). The free streams give 2,400 units (6,000,000 divided by 2,500). Add sales and you get 24,400 units.

Under the January rules: the paid streams still give 2,000 units. The free streams now give 4,000 units (6,000,000 divided by 1,500). The total becomes 26,000 units, a gain of 1,600 with no change in how people listened.

Now picture a rival album with the same 20,000 sales but a fan base that pays: 5,000,000 paid streams and 1,000,000 free ones. It scores 25,400 units under the current rules and 25,667 under the new ones. The free-heavy album jumps from second place to first on a formula change alone.

The shift is biggest per million plays. One million free streams make about 400 album units today. From January, the same million makes about 667, an increase of roughly two thirds.

That is why labels care so much. A gap of a few thousand units can decide who debuts at No. 1, and a No. 1 debut drives press, playlist placement and tour demand.


What This Means for You as a Listener

Most of the impact lands on artists and labels. Still, a few things change for the people actually pressing play.

Your free plays carry more weight

If you mostly watch music videos on free YouTube, your listening will show up on the charts again, and at a better rate than it did before YouTube left. Fans who organize "streaming parties" around a release week will notice this first. A free stream still counts for less than a paid one, so a fan base on free tiers needs roughly 1.5 plays to match one from a subscriber.

Paying does not buy your artist a big chart boost anymore

Some fans keep a subscription partly to help favorite acts chart. That reason just got weaker. PPC Land reports that YouTube Premium rose to $15.99 a month in the US this year and YouTube Music Premium to $11.99. Paying $11.99 a month, or $143.88 a year, now buys a 50% chart premium on each stream instead of 150%.

So pay for a subscription because you want what it gives you: no ads, offline downloads, background play. Do not pay mainly to move a chart. If your bills feel heavy, our breakdown of how much people underestimate their subscriptions is a good place to start an audit.

Charts versus what artists actually earn

Do not confuse chart weight with royalties. The Billboard ratio decides rankings. It does not change what a streaming service pays out per play. Billboard says its ratios rest on an analysis of paid and ad-supported streaming revenue, and paid plays still bring in more. If your aim is to put money in an artist's pocket, merch, tickets and direct purchases still do far more than any stream.


Why Free Listening Keeps Winning

This change fits a broader pattern across entertainment. Price hikes are pushing more people toward ad-supported plans, a trend we covered in why the ad tier is becoming the default plan for video streaming. Music is moving the same way. The free audience is too large for a chart to treat as second class.

YouTube's scale explains the pressure. According to PPC Land, Alphabet reported more than 150 million YouTube Music and Premium subscribers worldwide, including trials, in late October. That is large, but the free YouTube audience is much larger, and much of it watches music.

There is also a counterweight. Free streams are easier to fake than paid ones, since anyone can open a free account. Raising their value raises the payoff for bot farms and fraudulent plays. Expect Billboard and Luminate, the data firm that compiles its charts, to lean harder on filtering suspicious activity. AI-made tracks add another layer to that problem, as our look at AI music being sued and licensed at once explains.


Frequently Asked Questions

When do YouTube streams count on Billboard charts again?

YouTube data returns with the charts dated January 16. Those charts measure listening from January 1 to January 7, so your plays during the first week of January are the first to count.

Do YouTube views count toward the Billboard Hot 100?

Coverage of the change says YouTube data will feed song charts again, including the Hot 100. Billboard has not published the exact song-chart weighting, so the precise value of a free view on the Hot 100 is not public.

How many streams equal one album on the Billboard 200?

From January, 1,000 paid streams or 1,500 ad-supported streams equal one album unit. Until then, the ad-supported figure is 2,500 streams.

Why did YouTube stop sharing data with Billboard?

YouTube objected to Billboard counting a paid stream as worth far more than a free one. It called the formula outdated, asked for equal treatment, and stopped sending data after January 16 when Billboard declined to change enough.

Should I pay for a music subscription to help an artist chart?

It helps less than it used to. A paid stream now counts only 50% more than a free one on the album chart. Pay for the features you want, and support artists directly through tickets, merch or purchases.


The Bottom Line

From January 16, the Billboard charts will finally include YouTube again, and a free stream will count for two thirds of a paid one on the album chart. That rewards fan bases that listen without paying, and it should make the charts track what people actually play a little more closely.

For you, the practical takeaway is simple. Listen where you like. Pay for a subscription only if the features earn their price. And watch the first charts in January, because a few surprise No. 1 debuts are likely to come straight from this formula change.

Share

Written by

Eli Turner

Culture & Play

Covers entertainment, gaming, and sport for Quick Trend Insights, tracking how streaming economics and platform decisions reach the audience.

More articles

Related Articles

View all